Bibliometric analysis of production scientific publications of the IMSS Puebla Delegation
Keywords:
Bibliometric Indicators, Research, PeriodicalAbstract
Introduction: This is a bibliometric study focused on the scientific production of the IMSS personnel of the State of Puebla, to analyze their performance and impact during the period 2013-2017.
Objective: To promote and increase interest in creating new projects, identifying the current level of professionalization of the scientific community and the maturity of the authors.
Methods: A retrospective-descriptive-quantitative scientometric study was performed. The variables studied were: total articles published per year, average articles per author, most productive years, most prolific authors, and the collaboration index.
Results: The IMSS Puebla registered a scientific production of 170 documents, with the highest index in publications of original articles. The most productive year was 2017. 160 signatory authors were counted, and the collaboration rate was 9.7.
Conclusions: This work tries to motivate the authors from Puebla to create goals tending to increase their scientific production, to contribute to the national and international projection.
References
Okubo Y. STI Working Papers, No. 1997/01:Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems:methods and examples. Paris, France:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1997. Disponible en: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=OCDE/GD(97)41&docLanguage=En
Spinak E. Diccionario enciclopédico de bibliometría, cienciometría e informetría, Caracas, Venezuela:UNESCO, 1996. Disponible en:https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243329
López-Piñero JM, Terrada ML. Los indicadores bibliométricos y la evaluación de la actividad médica científica (III). Los indicadores de producción, circulación y dispersión;consumo de la información y repercusión. Med Clin. 1992;98:142-8. Disponible en:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000155&pid=S010211200200060000200009&lng=es
Sancho R. Indicadores bibliométricos utilizados en la evaluación de la ciencia y la tecnología. Rev Esp Doc Cient. 1990;13:842-6. Disponible en:https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/23694
Pu QH, Lyu QJ, Su HY. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015. BMJ Open. 2016;6(suppl):e011623. Disponible en:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489154
Camps D, Samar ME, Ávila RE, Recuero Y. Estudio bibliométrico de un volumen de la revista Archivos de Medicina. Arch Med. 2006;2(3):1-6. Disponible en:https://www.archivosdemedicina.com/medicina-de-familia/estudio-bibliomtrico-de-un-volumen-de-la-revista-archivos-de-medicina.pdf
Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics. 1985;8:149-59. Disponible en:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19219533
Smith DR. Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research. Scientometrics. 2012;92(2):13-17. Disponible en:https://akademiai.com/doi/pdf/10.1007/s11192-012-0685-x
Adam D. The counting house. Nature. 2002;415:726-9. Disponible en:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 11845174
López-Piñero JM, Terrada ML. Los indicadores bibliométricos y la evaluación de la actividad medicocientífica. Usos y abusos de la bibliometría. Med Clin. 1992;98:64-8
Garfield E. Citation indexing for studying science. Nature. 1970;227:669-71. Disponible en:http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p133y1962-73.pdf
Archambault E, Campbell D, Gingras Y. Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2009;60:1320-6. Disponible en:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.21062
Pringle J. Trends in the use of ISI citation databases for evaluation. Learn Publ. 2008;21:85-91. Disponible en:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1087/095 315108X288901
Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N. The assessment of science:the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001675. Disponible en:https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675
Moed HF. The impact-factors debate:the ISI's uses and limits. Nature. 2002;415:731-2. Disponible en:https://www.nature.com/articles/415731a
Moravcsik MJ. ¿Cómo evaluar la ciencia y a los científicos?Rev Esp Docu Cient. 1989;12:313-25
