Checklist as a tool for critical reading of published research papers

Authors

  • Jesús Eduardo Romo-Martínez <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social,Unidad de Medicina Familiar con Unidad M&eacute;dica de Atenci&oacute;n Ambulatoria 29, &nbsp;Acapulco, Guerrero</p>

Keywords:

Critical reading, Scientific and technical publications, Checklist

Abstract

The growth of scientific knowledge requires health professionals to form a habit of reading medical journals with minimum skills of comprehension, analysis and criticism in order to enrich the exercise of continuous updating. Learning the basics of epidemiology plays a very important role at the time of reading a medical publication; from the analytical point of view, it is important to understand the basis of this branch of medicine that allow to generate a critique of what we read with grounds. A check list is a useful test for the evaluation through observation (in this case the reading of a document), which enumerates the characteristics, aspects, qualities, etcetera, whose presence (or absence) we aim to determine. It is a list of comparison (material) to be applied while reading medical publications (method); an objective tool to facilitate the understanding and analysis. This list is divided into five essential sections: an overview of the publication, type of study, methodology, presentation and interpretation of results, as well as the discussion and conclusions of the publication. It is imperative to develop capacities to evaluate critical aspects that allow us using valid information and then integrating them to our knowledge. Far from seeking to shorten the fundamentals and basic concepts of basic epidemiology, biostatistics and research methodology, this is an invitation to the reader of medical journals to take a close look at the fascinating field of these branches of medicine through the references.

References

Hernández M, Lazcano E. Salud Pública teórica y práctica. 1ª ed. México: Manual Moderno; 2013.

 

Rivas R, Talavera J. Investigación clínica VII. Búsqueda sistemática: cómo localizar artículos. Rev. Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2012;50(1):53-8.

 

Tricco A, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis J. Clin epidemiol. 2011;64:11-20.

 

Khan K, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. Second edition. London: Royal Society of Medicine; 2011.

 

Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology. The architecture of clinical research. US: WB Saunders; 1985.

 

Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellström. Epidemiología básica. Segunda edición. Washington, D. C: OPS; 2008.

 

Talavera J, Rivas-Ruiz R. Investigación clínica VIII. Revisión estructurada de un artículo. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2012;50 (2):163-6.

 

Londoño F. Metodología de la investigación epidemiológica. 3a ed. Bogotá: Manual Moderno; 2004.

 

Feinstein AR. Principles of medical statistics. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2002.

 

Hernández M, Garrido F, López S. Diseño de estudios epidemiológicos. Salud Publica Mex. 2000;42(2):144-54.

 

Zaccai J. How to assess epidemiological studies. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:140-7.

 

González-Labrador G. Partes componentes y elaboración del protocolo de investigación y terminación del trabajo de la residencia. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr. 2010; 26(2):387-406.

 

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. Chicago IL: Appleton and Lange; 1993.

 

Celis AJ. Bioestadística. 2a ed. México: Manual Moderno; 2008.

 

Talavera J, Rivas R, Bernal L. Investigación clínica V. Tamaño de la muestra. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2011;49(5):517-522.

 

Hernández M, Garrido F, Salazar E. Sesgos en estudios epidemiológicos. Sal Publica Mex. 2000;42(5):438-46.

 

Talavera J, Rivas R. Investigación clínica IV. Pertinencia de la prueba estadística seleccionada. Rev Mex Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2011;49(4):401-5.

Published

2015-06-09

Issue

Section

Experiencias de la Práctica