Proposal to measure the relation supervision labor satisfaction in nursing
Keywords:
Work, Proccessing, Behavior, Nursing, Administration, SupervisoryAbstract
Introduction: the supervision is an outstanding function in the labor practice since it facilitates the connection between the Managers and the operative personnel of nursing, the effectiveness of the supervisor depends on his ability to interact with the personnel. The supervision methods: the direct and the indirect, are factors among others, that generate labor satisfaction in the operative personnel, which has an effect on the attention quality of nursing to the users of the health services. With regard to determining the relation among the variables: direct method of supervision, indirect method of supervision and the labor satisfaction of the nursing personnel of a medical institution, a questionnaire was designed and validated.
Material and methods: the instrument with 66 reactives consists of: I) Instructions to fill it in, II) Questions that form the intervening variables, III) Variable Direct Supervision Methods, IV) Variable Indirect Supervision Methods, V) Variable labor satisfaction and VI) Space for any comment, that the inquired considers about the document or subject of research.
Results: a first proof of the instrument was carried out to 30 nurses of operative level. Once the document was corrected a second pilot proof was applied to 76 nurses of operative level, applying the statistical program SPSS 9 reliability of the instrument was gotten reporting a Cronbach alpha of 0.86 which means that it measures the relation between the supervision methods and the labor satisfaction of the nursing personnel.
Conclusion: the instrument does measure the relationship between supervisory methods and job satisfaction of the nursing staff.
References
Balderas PL. Administración de los servicios de enfermería. Interamericana. MacGrawHill. México, DF. 1997. p. 111-31.
Beltrán EE. (1997) Modelo Administrativo para lograr la excelencia en enfermería. Rev. Desarrollo Científico de Enfermería. (10) p 313-320. México.
Alanis IV, et al. La supervisión de enfermería en la garantía de calidad en la atención al paciente hospitalizado. Hospital General de Zona No. 1 IMSS, Pachuca. Memorias de VI Reunión Nacional de investigación en enfermería IMSS. 1999; Oaxtepec, Morelos. México.
Begat & Severinsson. Implementation of clinical supervision in a medical. Department: nurses views of the effects. J Clin Nurs. England 1997; (5) p 389-394.
Cisneros GR et al. Análisis de la supervisión de la Jefe de piso de enfermería en la atención del paciente, en el Hospital General de Zona No.1 IMSS, Colima. Memorias VI Reunión Nacional de Investigación en Enfermería IMSS. Oaxtepec, Morelos. México. 1999;
Chávez H et al. Satisfacción laboral en médicos y enfermeras. Rev. Méd IMSS. 1996 (3) p 253-256 México.
Marriner & Tomey. Administración y liderazgo en enfermería. 5ª edición Mosby. 1996 México. pag. 348349.
Pacheco QL et al. Grado de satisfacción del personal de enfermería en Unidades de Medicina Familiar, IMSS. Rev Enferm IMSS. 1994; (1) p 33-36 México.
Yamashita M. Job satisfaction in japanese nurses. Journal of Advances Nursing. 1994; (22) p 158-164. Ontario, Canadá.
Ramírez MM. Estructuración de un formato nuevo para evaluar la satisfacción del prestador de servicio de enfermería, en el Hospital Victorio de la Fuente. IMSS. Memorias V Reunión Nacional de Investigación en Enfermería IMSS, Oaxtepec, Morelos. México. 1999.
Pérez S A. Administración de los servicios de salud en enfermería. 1ª. Edición. Trillas. 1992; México.
