Concordance between knowledge and performance of aseptic technique on preparing intravenous medications

Main Article Content

Mercedes Solís-Chacón
Marcela Ayala-Zamudio
Berenice Isela García-Calvo
Camila Alicia Martínez-Tovar
Cecilia Velázquez-Morales
Antonio Castellanos-Olivares

Keywords

Knowledge, Aseptic Technique, Preparation of medications

Abstract

Introduction: Aseptic technique on preparing intravenous medications is in a 90% of the cases a nurse responsibility, as pharmacology takes advances, nurses are facing a complex process with major requirements to perform this task in a right, safety, and on time way.

Objective: To identify the concordance between knowledge and performance of aseptic technique in preparation of intravenous medications.

Methodology: Transversal, analytic study. Throughout sampling for convenience, 54 critical care nurses, and 19 doctors with anesthesia residency were studied. Dependent variables: knowledge and performance of aseptic technique in the preparation of intravenous medications. A verification guide was utilized and later on questionnaires were surveyed under the amendments of Helsinki Declaration.

Results: 43% nurses were working in evening shift and 89% of the doctors with residency were floating in the morning shift. It was observed that 38 people had knowledge in relation to hand washing, 47% do not perform it. With a medium concordance, 37 people have knowledge on the use of the alcohol as bacteriostatic, 56% do not use it. From 47 people who have knowledge regarding to vial's cleaning in preparing medications, 64% do not perform it.

Discussion: Results obtained in this study are quite unfavorable since only in hand washing it was found a medium concordance and in the others variables it was a discordance; it is a concern that such a common practice and apparently simple practice is not performed up by nurses and doctors.

Abstract 0 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 0

References

MMWR. Centers for Disease Control. Post surgical infections associate with extrinsically contaminated intravenous anesthetic agent. California, Illinois, Maine, and Michigan, 1990,39: 426-427,433.

 

Bennett SN, McNeil MM, Bland LS, Arduino MJ, Villarino ME, Perrotta DM, Et. Alt. N. Postoperative infections traced to contamination of an intravenous anesthetic, propofol. Engl J Med. 1995; 333(3): 147-154.

 

Veber MD, Gachot, Bedos JP, Wolff M. Severe sepsis after intravenous injection of contaminate propofol, anestesiología, 1994; 3(80): 712.

 

Lozano NR, Barriga AG, Moreno AM, Rojas ML, Castillo TN. Contaminación bacteriana extrínseca de propofol . Rev Mex Anest, 1999; 22: 59-67.

 

Zacher NA, Zornow HM, Evans G. Drug contamination from opening glass ampoules anestesiology 199; 75: 893-895. 

 

Rodríguez CR. Vademécum académico de medicamentos. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana. 2001; 808-809.

 

Diccionario Terminológico de ciencias médicas, 13a Edición. México: MASSON. 2001;131.

 

Rosales BS, Reyes GE. Fundamentos de enfermería, 2a Edición, México: Manual Moderno 1999; 39-24.

 

BW D u Gas. Tratado de enfermería, 4a Edición, México. Interamericana. 1986; 583-591.

 

Curse Home/ModuleHome/ayuda/ 2003. http://Search.yahoo.com/ Search.